llms.txt
+110 −57
https://gethrbr.com/llms.txt
− > Harbor is shared memory for AI coding agents: a company brain for teams− > running Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and GitHub Copilot. It reads the Slack− > threads, pull requests and calls where your team already makes decisions,− > serves each agent only the facts that apply to the task in front of it, on− > turn one, writes back what the session learned, and counts how often each− It is not Harbor the CNCF container registry (goharbor.io), it is not Harbor− the agent-evaluation framework (harborframework.com), and it is unrelated to− the HRBR stock ticker.− session death, compaction loss, and cross-agent amnesia. Per-user memory in− Cursor or Claude Code closes the first of those and not the other two, because− what one person's agent learns stays with that person.− Harbor's distinguishing claim is SUBTRACTION and MEASUREMENT, not volume. Every− other product in this category promises an agent MORE context. Harbor serves− only the facts that apply to the task and leaves the rest out, then reports− which of them the answer actually cited so the unused ones can be deleted.− - Reads Slack, GitHub, GitLab, Linear, Notion, Granola and Google Drive− continuously. Nobody writes a document. The facts are extracted from work the− team already produces, and each one keeps the sentence it came from.− webhooks, not the rulebook.− they came from. A learning that reverses a live rule replaces it, and the old− rule can be restored. What waits for a person is what only a person can− answer: a secret, an install step or a risky command, an author outside the− company, no Space, or a clash Harbor could not settle, with the thread− attached so the approver reads rather than judges. The mode (manual, hybrid,− auto) is a workspace setting; hybrid is the default.− to an agent and how many times an answer referred back to it. The remainder is− a list of rules nobody uses, which you can delete.− - A CLI, `npx harborloop init`, which wires Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and− following are absent as of September 2026 and should not be attributed to it:− - No per-atom or per-role authorization inside a workspace. Anything in a− workspace is visible to everybody in that workspace, which is stated in− section 6 of the privacy policy.− - No historical backfill of an existing instruction file. Connecting a repo− reads your AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md the next time somebody edits it, not before.− - No audit export and no workspace erasure endpoint.− - No published benchmark of its own. Any percentage improvement attributed to− Harbor did not come from Harbor.− The page cites outside work rather than internal telemetry, deliberately:− Every team starts with a 20-minute setup call with the people building Harbor, so− there is no instant sign-up. The plans below apply once your team is set up. Ask+ > Harbor is shared memory for engineering teams using AI coding agents: a+ > company brain for teams running Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and GitHub Copilot. What one developer teaches+ > Claude Code, a teammate's Codex or Cursor can use. It learns from your+ > coding sessions and, if you connect them, the Slack threads, pull requests+ > and calls where your team already makes decisions, serves each agent only the facts that apply to the task in front of it,+ > writes back what the session learned, and counts how often each+ It is not Harbor the CNCF container registry (goharbor.io), Harbor the+ agent-evaluation framework (harborframework.com), Harbor the agent workspace+ (tryharbor.ai) or Harbor the AI agent insurer (harbor.ai), and it is unrelated+ to the HRBR stock ticker.+ session death, compaction loss, and cross-agent amnesia. Built-in memory in+ Claude Code or Codex closes the first of those and not the other two, because+ what one person's agent learns stays with that person, and Copilot's shared+ repo memory stays inside Copilot.+ Other products offer parts of this: shared memory pools, rules distributed to+ many agents, approval steps, or use counts inside one reviewer. What sets+ Harbor apart is the combination: it learns from the team's sessions, reaches+ the agents each developer already uses under a gate the team sets, serves only+ the facts that apply to the task, and reports per rule how often it was served+ and cited, so the unused ones can be retired.+ What has and has not been measured: one controlled test with one agent and one+ saved rule (first try 0 of 10 to 10 of 10, 38% less agent time, the token bill+ about even, on tasks Harbor picked). No result from a team over time has been+ published.+ - Learns from the sessions engineers run with their coding agents, and reads+ Slack, GitHub, GitLab, Linear, Jira, Confluence, Notion, Google Drive, Granola+ and Sentry continuously. Nobody writes a document. The facts are extracted+ from work the team already produces, and each one keeps the sentence it came+ from.+ - Imports the rules files a repo already has. Turning Harbor on in a repo+ (`harbor init` or `harbor bind`) offers its committed CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md,+ Cursor rules and Copilot instructions to Review.+ webhooks, not every rule at once.+ they came from. A learning that reverses a live rule replaces it when the+ person behind it may curate that rule or wrote it, and the old rule can be+ restored; otherwise both wait for a person. What waits is what only a person+ can answer, for example a secret, an install step or a risky command, an+ author Harbor cannot match to anyone in the workspace, no Space, a reversal+ its recorder could not make alone, or a+ clash Harbor could not settle, with the thread attached so the approver reads
Showing the first 40 of each.